A Comprehensive Comparison Between Virtual and Traditional Laboratories in Engineering Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/h2c8xd88الكلمات المفتاحية:
virtual laboratories, traditional laboratories, engineering curriculaالملخص
Laboratory experiences are a cornerstone of engineering education, providing students with the opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge to practical problems. With the rise of digital technologies, virtual laboratories have emerged as a viable alternative to traditional hands-on laboratories. This article provides an in-depth comparison of virtual and traditional laboratories, examining their effectiveness, accessibility, cost, and impact on student learning outcomes. The discussion also explores the potential of a blended approach, combining the strengths of both methods to create a more comprehensive educational experience. The findings suggest that while traditional laboratories offer invaluable hands-on experience, virtual laboratories provide flexibility, scalability, and opportunities for remote learning. The article concludes with recommendations for integrating both approaches into engineering curricula.
التنزيلات
المراجع
1. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. *ACM Computing Surveys*, 38(3), 7.
2. Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. *Journal of Engineering Education*, 94(1), 121-130.
3. Potkonjak, V., et al. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. *Computers & Education*, 95, 309-327.
4. Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. *Computers & Education*, 87, 218-237.
5. de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. *Science*, 340(6130), 305-308.
6. Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., & Chassapis, C. (2007). Remote versus hands-on labs: A comparative study. *International Journal of Engineering Education*, 23(4), 1-10.
7. Wieman, C. E., & Perkins, K. K. (2005). Transforming physics education. *Physics Today*, 58(11), 36-41.
8. Dormido, S. (2004). Control learning: Present and future. *Annual Reviews in Control*, 28(1), 115-136.
9. Schnieder, M., Williams, S., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Labs/Tutorials for Engineering Students Using Blended Learning Principles. Education Sciences, 12(3).
10. Solak, S., Yakut, O., & Bolat, E. D. (2020). Design and implementation of web-based virtual mobile robot laboratory for engineering education. Symmetry, 12(6), Article 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12060906
11. Szávuly, M. I., Tóos, Á., Barabás, R., & Szilágyi, B. (2019). From modeling to virtual laboratory development of a continuous binary distillation column for engineering education using MATLAB and LabVIEW. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(5), 1019-1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22119
12. Tejado, I., González, I., Pérez, E., & Merchán, P. (2021). Introducing systems theory with virtual laboratories at the University of Extremadura: How to improve learning in the lab in engineering degrees. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 58(4), 874-899.
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 مجلة العلوم الشاملة
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
