Fabrication and Evaluating Cellulose Acetate Flat-Sheet FO Membranes with Ionic-Liquid ([HBet][Tf₂N]) and Inorganic (NaCl, MgCl₂) Draw Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/g4w0pc68Keywords:
Cellulose acetate (CA); Forward osmosis (FO); Ionic liquid ([Hbet][Tf₂N]); Heat treatment.Abstract
Forward osmosis (FO) has emerged as a highly attractive separation process for water desalination due to its reliance on natural osmotic pressure gradients rather than high external hydraulic pressures. In FO, water molecules spontaneously diffuse from a dilute feed solution toward a concentrated draw solution through a semi-permeable membrane that selectively permits water transport while rejecting solutes. In the present investigation, cellulose acetate (CA) flat-sheet membranes were prepared with two different polymer loadings (20 wt.% and 25 wt.%) in order to assess the relationship between membrane structure and FO performance. Experimental results revealed that lowering the polymer concentration significantly enhanced water flux, albeit at the expense of reduced solute rejection, underscoring the classical permeability–selectivity trade-off. Furthermore, the influence of thermal conditioning through a two-step heat treatment (20 min at 60 °C and 90 °C) was systematically analyzed. The untreated CA membrane achieved the highest water flux of 1.48 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹, in contrast to 1.254 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹ and 1.006 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹ for membranes subjected to 60 °C and 90 °C treatment, respectively, highlighting the flux decline induced by thermal densification of the polymer matrix. Remarkably, the CA-0 membrane exhibited superior water permeation when paired with the UCST ionic liquid ([Hbet][Tf₂N]) as the draw solution. Within 30 seconds, approximately 7.0 g of feed water was transported across the membrane, outperforming conventional inorganic salts such as NaCl (6.33 g) and MgCl₂ (4.12 g) under identical operating conditions. These findings confirm that the UCST ionic liquid offers a stronger osmotic driving force, thereby achieving superior flux performance and demonstrating its potential as a next-generation draw agent for FO desalination.
Downloads
References
Achilli, A., Cath, T. Y., & Childress, A. E. (2010). Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 364(1–2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.010
Akther, N., Sodiq, A., Giwa, A., Daer, S., Arafat, H. A., & Hasan, S. W. (2015). Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination : A review. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 281, 502–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.080
Balyan, U., & Sarkar, B. (2015). Enhanced Separation of Polyethylene Glycol from Bovine Serum Albumin Using Electro-Ultrafiltration. Separation Science and Technology, 50(12), 1846–1859. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2015.1014493
Cai, Y., Shen, W., Wei, J., Chong, H., Wang, R., Krantz, W. B., Fane, G., & Hu, X. (2015a). Environmental Science using responsive ionic liquid draw solutes †. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 1, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EW00073K
Cai, Y., Shen, W., Wei, J., Chong, T. H., Wang, R., Krantz, W. B., Fane, A. G., & Hu, X. (2015b). Energy-efficient desalination by forward osmosis using responsive ionic liquid draw solutes. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 1(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EW00073K
Cai, Y., Wang, R., Krantz, W. B., Fane, G., & Matthew, X. (2015). RSC Advances Exploration of using thermally responsive polyionic liquid hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis †. RSC Advances, 5, 97143–97150. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19018E
Chekli, L., Phuntsho, S., Shon, H. K., Vigneswaran, S., Kandasamy, J., & Chanan, A. (2012). A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications. Desalination and Water Treatment, 43(August 2015), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.672168
Chung, T.-S., Zhang, S., Wang, K. Y., Su, J., & Ling, M. M. (2012). Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination, 287(C), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.019
Idris, A. N. I., & Zain, N. M. A. T. (2007). EFFECT OF HEAT TREATMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS OF POLYETHERSULFONE ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES Membranes with good resistant and selectivity are necessary where efficient separation process is very important for the industrial sector to. Jurnal Teknologi, 44, 27–40.
Kimmerle, K., & Strathmann, H. (1990). Analysis of the structure-determining process of phase inversion membranes. Desalination, 79(2–3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(90)85012-Y
Kunst, B., & Sourirajan, S. (1970). Development and performance of some porous cellulose acetate membranes for reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 14(10), 2559–2568. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1970.070141011
Marth, E. H. (1998). Extended shelf life refrigerated foods: Microbiological quality and safety. Food Technology, 52(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EAFE2-120045616
Mehrparvar, A., Rahimpour, A., & Jahanshahi, M. (2014). Modified ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 45(1), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.003
Minier-Matar, J., Hussain, A., Santos, A., Janson, A., Wang, R., Fane, A. G., & Adham, S. (2015). Advances in Application of Forward Osmosis Technology for Volume Reduction of Produced/Process Water from Gas-Field Operations. International Petroleum Technology Conference. https://doi.org/doi:10.2523/IPTC-18380-MS
Mohd Yusof, M. A., Abu Seman, M. N., & Hilal, N. (2016). Development of polyamide forward osmosis membrane for humic acid removal. Desalination and Water Treatment, 3994(February), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1140283
Mustaffar, M. I., Ismail, a. F., & Illias, R. M. (2004). Study on the effect of polymer concentration on hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane performance and morphology. Regional Conference on Engineering Education RCEE 2005, 1–12.
Phuntsho, S., Vigneswaran, S., Kandasamy, J., Hong, S., Lee, S., & Shon, H. K. (2012). Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process. Journal of Membrane Science, 415–416, 734–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.065
Su, J., Yang, Q., Teo, J. F., & Chung, T. S. (2010a). Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 355(1–2), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.003
Su, J., Yang, Q., Teo, J. F., & Chung, T.-S. (2010b). Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 355(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.003
Tang, C. Y., She, Q., Lay, W. C. L., Wang, R., & Fane, A. G. (2010). Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. Journal of Membrane Science, 354(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.059
Thompson, N. A., & Nicoll, P. G. (2011). Forward osmosis desalination: a commercial reality. IDA World Congress - Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre (PCEC), Perth, Western Australia., 16.
Wang, Y., Lau, W. W. Y., & Sourirajan, S. (1994). Effects of pretreatments on morphology and performance of cellulose acetate (formamide type) membranes. Desalination, 95(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(94)00011-5
Ward, F. a, & Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2008). Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(47), 18215–18220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805554105
Zhong, Y., Feng, X., Chen, W., Wang, X., Huang, K.-W., Gnanou, Y., & Lai, Z. (2015). Using UCST Ionic Liquid as a Draw Solute in Forward Osmosis to Treat High-Salinity Water. Environmental Science & Technology, acs.est.5b03747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03747
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Comprehensive Journal of Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
