Genetical and Principal Component Analyses for Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in F1 and F2 Generations

Authors

  • athiyah, A. Arhoumah 1*, and M. A. El-Hennawy, and I. E. El-Beially 2 1 قسم تقنية الإنتاج النباتي ، المعهد العالي للتقنيات الزراعية، درنة، ليبيا. 2 قسم المحاصيل، كلية الزراعة، جامعة الازهر، القاهرة، مصر , 1 Department of Plant Production Technology, Higher Institute of Agricultural Technologies, Derna, Libya 2 Department, of Plant Production Agricultural Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/4h3zbf63

Keywords:

Analysis of variance; genotypes; parental; F1and F2 .

Abstract

   Eight bread wheat genotypes were crossed using a half diallel design to explore the genetic patterns of grain yield and several agronomic characteristics in the F1 and F2 generations. The additive genetic variance (D) showed significant effects for all studied traits in both generations, except for the number of kernels per spike in F1. The dominance variance (H1) was significant for all traits in both generations, while the second dominance component (H2) was significant for all traits except grain yield per plant in F1 and F2, and plant height in F2. This indicates an unequal distribution of positive and negative alleles among the loci controlling these traits and confirms that both additive and dominance gene actions influence their inheritance. The distribution of positive and negative alleles differed among parents for all evaluated traits. The mean degree of dominance (H1/D)½ was below unity for plant height, number of spikes per plant, and spike length, suggesting partial dominance in their inheritance. The ratio of dominant to recessive alleles (KD/KR) exceeded unity for all traits, showing that dominance alleles were more frequent in both generations. The relative frequency of dominant to recessive alleles (F) was significant for all traits except 100-kernel weight, which indicated an equal gene distribution among parents. Broad-sense heritability showed very high values, ranging from 92.46% to 98.92% in F1 and from 91.14% to 98.65% in F2, revealing that most phenotypic variation was genetically controlled. The combination of high broad-sense and moderate narrow-sense heritability indicates that non-additive gene effects contributed substantially to trait variation. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) demonstrated that selecting superior genotypes can enhance yield and its related traits. Based on PCA, parents P2, P4, and P6; F1 crosses C2, C14, C20, C11, and C3; and F2 hybrids H2, H4, H3, H15, and H14 were identified as the best performing genotypes for yield potential. These genotypes are recommended for use in future wheat breeding programs to improve productivity under varying environmental conditions. The results confirm that the studied yield traits in wheat are controlled by both additive and dominance genetic effects. The high heritability values indicate the possibility of achieving successful early selection programs to improve wheat productivity using these superior genetic combinations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allah, S. U. ; A. S., Khan ; A., Raza and S., Sadique. (2010). Gene action analysis of yield and yield related traits spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 12: 125-128

Ashoush, H. A. (2006). Breeding for yield and its components in some bread wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.). Alex .J. of Agric. Sci.27 (3): 322- 335.

Bakhsh, A.; A., Hussain and A. S., Khan. (2003). Genetic studies of plant height, yield and its components in bread wheat. Sarhad. J. Agric.19: 529-534.

EL-Gammal, A. A. and A. I., Yahya. (2018). Genetic variability and heterosis in F1 and F2 generations of diallel crosses among seven Wheat genotypes .J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., Vol. 9 (12): 1075 – 1086

EL-Hosary A.A.A. And A., Gehan Nour El Deen. (2015). Genetic analysis in the F1 and F2 wheat generations of diallel crosses Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 19 (2):355 –373.

EL-Hosary, A. A. A. (2020). Estimation of gene action and heterosis in F1 and F2 diallel crosses among seven genotypes of field Bean. J. of Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., Vol 11 (12):1383 – 1391.

Farshadfar, E.; F., Rafiee and A., Yghotipoor. (2012). Comparison of the efficiency among half diallel methods in the genetic analysis of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress condition. Annals of Biol. Res. 3(3): 1607- 1622.

Fellahi, Z. El. A.; A., Hannachi and H., Bouzerzour. (2018). Analysis of direct and indirect selection and indices in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Segregating Progeny. Int .J. of Agr. Vol. Article ID 8312857.

Gita Chudhari, R. C.; D. A., Patel; A. D., Kalola and S., Kumar. (2023). Diallel analysis using graphical & numerical approach for grain yield & its attributes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agri., 13(1), 171.

Gomez, K. A. and A.A. Gomez. (1984). Statistical procedures for agri. research, 2nd Edition, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. 3nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.;376.

Hayman, B. I. (1954a). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics. 39,789-809.

Hayman, B. I. (1954b). The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometics. 10, 235-244.

Jinks, J. L. (1954). The analysis of continuous variation in dialled crosses of Nicotiana rustica varities. Genetics 39, 767 - 788.

Kamara, M. M.; M. , Rehan; A. M. , Mohamed; R. F. , El- Mantawy; A. M. S. , Kheir ; D. ,Abd El-Moneim; F. A. ,Safhi; S. M. , ALshamrani ; E. M. ,Hafez ; S. I. , Behiry. (2022). Genetic potential and inheritance patterns of physiological, agronomic and quality traits in bread wheat under normal and water deficit conditions. J. Plants, 11(7): 952.

Koumber, R. M. (2011). Estimation of genetic parameters for some quantitative traits in two bread wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.) Minufiya. J. Agric. Res. 36(2): 359-369.

Mari, S. N.; B. A., Ansari; M. B., Kumbhar and M. I., Keerio. (2015). Gene action governing inheritance of economically valued traits among F1 hybrids of hexaploid wheat derived through diallel mating system. Sindh Univ. Res. J. 47 (4): 663-668.

Mather, K. and J. L. Jinks (1982). Biometrical genetics. (2nd ed.), chapman and hall Ltd. London.

Mohammed, I. M. (2020). Study of half diallel among genotypes of bread wheat (Triticum Aestivium L.) for Yield and its components. plant Archives 20(2):1-14.

Morsy, S. M.; I. S. ,Elbasyoni; A. M. , Abdallah; P. S. , Baenziger .(2021). mposing water deficit on modern and wild wheat collections to identify drought-resilient genotypes. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 1, 1–14.

Muqaddasi, Q.H; J., Brassac; A., Börner; K., Pillen and M.S., Röder. (2017). Genetic Architecture of Anther Extrusion in Spring and Winter Wheat .J. Frontiers Plant Sci., 8:754.

Pavlovic, M.; O., nikolic and Z., Jestrovic. (2016). Genetic analysis of variability and inheritance of nitrogen harvest index in wheat (Tritium aestivum). Bulgarian. J. of Agri. Sci., 22 (No 1) 2016, 119-124.

Naglaa Qabil. (2017). Genetic analysis of yield and Its attributes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Egypt .J. Agr. Vol .39, No.3, pp. 337 – 356.

Qaseem, M.F.; R., Qureshi and H., Shaheen. (2019). Effects of pre-anthesis drought, heat and their combination on the growth, yield and physiology of diverse wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes varying in sensitivity to heat and drought stress. Sci. Rep., 9, 6955.

Rania, A. R. El-Said (2018). Assessment of genetical parameters of yield and its attributes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.). J. Agri. Chem. and Biotechn, Mansoura Univ .Vol. 9 (10): 243 – 251.

Seleem, S. A. and Koumber. (2011). Estimation of combining ability and gene action in the F1 and F2 generations in some bread wheat crosses. Minufiya. J. Agric. Res. 36(6): 1627-1648.

Shamuyarira, K.W.; H., Shimelis; S., Figlan and V., Chaplot. (2022). Path coefficient and principal component analyses for biomass allocation, drought tolerance and carbon sequestration potential in wheat. J. Plants, 11, 1407.

Singh, B. D. (2000). Breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses. I. Drought resistance. In: Plant Breeding Principles and Methods. 381-409 pp.

Thapa, S.; S., Reddy; M., Fuentealba; Q., Xue; J., Rudd; K., Jessup; R., Devkota; S., Liu (2018). Physiological responses to water stress and yield of winter wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 204, 347–358.

Waner, J., N. (1952). A method for estimating heritability. Agron. J., 44 (9): 427-430.

Zaazaa, E., I. (2017). Genetic analysis of yield and its components in some bread wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.) using five parameters model. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ.; Vol. 8(11): 1215 – 1220.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Genetical and Principal Component Analyses for Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in F1 and F2 Generations . (2025). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 10(37), 766-799. https://doi.org/10.65405/4h3zbf63