Effect of Manufacture of Industrial and Agricultural Waste By-Products on the Strength of Geopolymer Mortar

Authors

  • Otman M. M. Elbasir1 , Yousef. A. Elkhealy2 , Kauther . M. A. Rakha1 1High Institute Of Science and Technology -Qaser Bin Gahsear , Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/.v10i37.313

Keywords:

: Industrial and agricultural materials Waste; Material (u-POFA), (FA), and (GGBS), Compressive Strength; X-ray diffractography (XRD).

Abstract

Recent research in the field of concrete and construction materials has shifted toward manufacturing an alternative to cement, which is geopolymer, considered an effective and environmentally friendly substitute. The primary focus of this work was to use solid waste materials from industrial and agricultural sources as a binding agent for each type of geopolymer mortar. In this study, we have three materials: palm oil waste (u-POFA), fly ash from power plants (FA), and blast furnace slag (GBFS). Standard cubes were made and tested at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days to investigate the geopolymer mortar. We observe a higher increase in the calcium-rich GBFS samples compared to the FA and u-POFA samples. The range of strength obtained for the samples was respectively from 14.67 to 38.30 (N/mm²) for u-POFA, from 34.10 to 56.82 (N/mm²) for FA, and from 66.89 to 83.44 (N/mm²). The properties of the samples were validated thru (XRD) analyzes. The results show that the main bonding phases consist of aluminum silicate crystals, calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H), and aluminum and calcium silicate hydrate (C–A–S–H).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Hassan Laminu., 2021. Evaluation for Mechanical Properties of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) Blended Granite - Gravel Concrete’. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 3 (2021) pp: 28-34. www.questjournals.org

[2]. Sata., V., Jaturapitakkul., C., & Rattanashotinunt, C., (2010) “Compressive Strength and Heat Evolution of Concretes Containing Palm Oil Fuel Ash”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, ©ASCE, ISSN 0899- 1561/2010/10-1033–1038.

[3] Karim MR, Zain MFM, Jamil M, Lai FC. Fabrication of a non-cement binder using slag, palm oil fuel ash and rice husk ash with sodium hydroxide. Constr Build Mater 2013;49:894–902.

[4]. ACAA American Coal Ash Association (ACAA). 2016 Production and Use Survey Results News Release. Available online: https://acaa-usa.org/publications/production-use-reports/ (accessed on 28 May 2018).

[5]. Otman MM Elbasir, Megat Azmi Megat Johari, MJA Mijarsh. Investigation on Strength Enhancement of U-TPOFA Based Binary Blended Alkali Activated Mortar Through Addition of Fly Ash. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_85

[6]. ASTM, C. (1999a). 109 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 318.

[7]. ASTM, C. (1999a). 109 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 318.

[8]. Chindaprasirt, P., Chareerat, T., & Sirivivatnanon, V. (2007). Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29(3), 224-229.

[9]. Mijarsh, M., Johari, M. M., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2015b). Effect of delay time and Na 2 SiO 3 concentrations on compressive strength development of geopolymer mortar synthesized from TPOFA. Construction and Building Materials, 86, 64-74.

[10]. Kupwade-Patil, K. & Allouche, E. (2011). Effect of alkali silica reaction (ASR) in geopolymer concrete. Proceedings from World of Coal Ash (WOCA) conference

[11]. Samet, B. & Chaabouni, M. (2004). Characterization of the Tunisian blast-furnace slag and its application in the formulation of a cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(7), 1153-1159.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Effect of Manufacture of Industrial and Agricultural Waste By-Products on the Strength of Geopolymer Mortar. (2025). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 10(37), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.65405/.v10i37.313