Preliminary Evaluation of the Antinociceptive Activity of the Ethanolic Leaf Extract of Datura metel L. Collected in Misurata, Libya, Using the Hot Plate Test in Mice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/3rq8qc05Keywords:
Datura metel; antinociceptive; hot plate; tropane alkaloids; Libya; Swiss albino miceAbstract
Background: Datura metel L. (Solanaceae) is used in traditional medicine for pain relief, yet experimental data on plants growing in Libya are lacking.
Objective: To make a preliminary assessment of the antinociceptive activity of the 75% ethanolic leaf extract of D. metel collected in Misurata, Libya, in mice.
Methods: Dried leaf powder (35 g) was macerated in 175 mL of 75% ethanol for 72 h with continuous stirring, filtered and dried at 40 °C. Ten Swiss albino mice (n = 2 per group) were allocated to five groups: untreated control, normal saline, paracetamol (standard), and extract solutions of 10% and 20% (w/v), all given orally at 10 mL/kg. Reaction latency (paw licking, paw lifting or jumping) was recorded on a hot plate at 0, 60 and 90 min. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used.
Results: At 60 min, latency differed significantly among groups (p = 0.016). The 10% extract produced the longest latency (10.22 ± 0.005 s) compared with control (4.03 ± 0.65 s) and saline (4.88 ± 0.08 s) (both p < 0.05), but not compared with paracetamol (6.83 ± 1.53 s). The 20% extract (6.06 ± 0.59 s) was not different from the vehicle. No significant differences were found at 0 min (p = 0.111; plate at 30 °C) or at 90 min (p = 0.540), where the saline group also showed prolonged latencies.
Conclusion: The 10% extract showed a short-lived, non-dose-dependent increase in hot plate latency at 60 min. Given the very small sample, the absence of motor and toxicity assessment and the high nominal dose, these findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating only.
Downloads
References
1. Eddy NB, Leimbach D. Synthetic analgesics. II. Dithienylbutenyl- and dithienylbutylamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1953;107(3):385–393.
2. Woolfe G, MacDonald AD. The evaluation of the analgesic action of pethidine hydrochloride (Demerol). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1944;80:300–307.
3. Maheshwari NO, Khan A, Chopade BA. Rediscovering the medicinal properties of Datura sp.: a review. J Med Plants Res. 2013;7(39):2885–2897.
4. Alam W, Khan H, Khan SA, Nazir S, Akkol EK. Datura metel: a review on chemical constituents, traditional uses and pharmacological activities. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(42):5388.
5. Wannang NN, Ndukwe HC, Nnabuife C. Evaluation of the analgesic properties of the Datura metel seeds aqueous extract. J Med Plants Res. 2009;3(4):192–195.
6. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000410.
7. Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW. Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(4):597–652.
8. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3670–3695.
9. Gaire BP, Subedi L. A review on the pharmacological and toxicological aspects of Datura stramonium L. J Integr Med. 2013;11(2):73–79.
10. Soni P, Siddiqui AA, Dwivedi J, Soni V. Pharmacological properties of Datura stramonium L. as a potential medicinal tree: an overview. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(12):1002–1008.
11. Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC, editors. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2018.
12. Graham GG, Scott KF. Mechanism of action of paracetamol. Am J Ther. 2005;12(1):46–55.
13. Anderson BJ. Paracetamol (acetaminophen): mechanisms of action. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(10):915–921.
14. Tukey JW. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 1949;5(2):99–114.
15. Festing MFW, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR J. 2002;43(4):244–258.
16. Charan J, Kantharia ND. How to calculate sample size in animal studies? J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(4):303–306.
17. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22(3):659–661.
18. Lorke D. A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch Toxicol. 1983;54(4):275–287.
19. Russell WMS, Burch RL. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen; 1959.
20. Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. 3rd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1998.
21. Evans WC. Trease and Evans' Pharmacognosy. 16th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
22. Vogel HG, editor. Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Pharmacological Assays. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
23. Eglen RM. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in neuronal and non-neuronal cholinergic function. Auton Autacoid Pharmacol. 2006;26(3):219–233.
