Dialogic Pedagogy and EFL Learning: From Teacher Transmission to Collaborative Meaning-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/64j0xv12Keywords:
Dialogic Pedagogy; Collaborative Dialogue; Classroom Interaction; Exploratory Talk; Teacher DevelopmentAbstract
English as a foreign language (EFL) education has often been organized around teacher explanation, display questions, correction, and student reproduction of forms. Dialogic pedagogy offers a different orientation in which learners and teachers use language to examine ideas, negotiate meanings, reason together, and revise understanding. This paper synthesizes sociocultural, dialogic, classroom-discourse, and second-language research to examine how this shift can support EFL learning without abandoning teacher expertise or curricular responsibility. The reviewed evidence indicates several potential mechanisms, including extended output, uptake and repair, collaborative reasoning, noticing, and affective engagement. However, causal evidence remains uneven. Controlled studies report gains in vocabulary, phonological awareness, and feedback-supported writing, whereas qualitative and correlational studies document productive classroom talk, willingness to communicate, and learner perceptions. The effects of dialogic pedagogy appear to depend on proficiency, task design, participation norms, assessment regimes, class size, teacher development, and digital access. Accordingly, dialogic EFL teaching is best understood not as unstructured conversation or simply maximizing student speech, but as the deliberate orchestration of scaffolding, interaction, and learning opportunities. Its effectiveness ultimately depends on aligning dialogic practices with instructional goals, learner needs, classroom conditions, and assessment practices.
Downloads
References
Alexander, R. J. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
Aksoy-Pekacar, K. (2023). The distribution of interactional space and collaboration in EFL task-based peer interactions. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.525.1
Aksoy-Pekacar, K. (2024). Task-related collaborative behaviours in task-based oral peer interactions. The Language Learning Journal, 52(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2023.2193577
Ammar, A., & Hassan, R. M. (2018). Talking it through: Collaborative dialogue and second language learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 46–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12254
An, J., & Childs, A. (2023). Teacher questions, wait time, and student output in classroom interaction in EMI science classes: An interdisciplinary view. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38283
Asterhan, C. S. C., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.312
Ayad, N., Alrumayh, S., Hasan, L., Omar, Z., Hmuma, M., Alouzi, K., Kasheem, M., & Masuwd, M. (2026). The integration of Islamic values in teaching and learning practices at the University of Zawia. Cigarskruie: Journal of Educational and Islamic Research, 3(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.65190/cigarskruie.v3i2.472
Bahar, O., Purwati, O., & Setiawan, S. (2022). Exploring teacher power use and student silence in an EFL classroom: Evidence from Indonesia. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.16
Bakhtin, M. M. (1987). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.). University of Texas Press. https://utpress.utexas.edu/9780292775602/
Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814547037
Chow, B. W.-Y., Hui, A. N.-N., Li, Z., & Dong, Y. (2023). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1408–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399
García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140
Ha, X. V., & Nguyen, L. T. (2021). Targets and sources of oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: Are students’ and teachers’ beliefs aligned? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697160
Hadi, M. J. (2015). Barriers in teaching English in large classes: Voice of an Indonesian English language teacher (ERIC ED582906). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582906.pdf
Hennessy, S., Howe, C., Mercer, N., & Vrikki, M. (2020). Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404
Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., García-Carrión, R., Torreblanca, O., & Barrera, M. J. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
Hmouma, M., Sumia Albuisi, & Tahani Hamoma. (2026). The Efficacy of Designing a Human versus Automated Voice Advance Organizer within an E-Book on Developing Some Scientific Concepts among Visually Impaired Students in Tripoli – Libya. University of Zawia Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.26629/uzjeps.2026.10
Hmouma, Mohamed (2025). Analyzing Trump’s 2025 inaugural address using Fairclough’s Critical discourse analysis model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(1), 4630-4636.
Ho, D. G. E., Sa’adi, M., He, D., & Hoon, C.-Y. (2023). Silence over the wire: Student verbal participation and the virtual classroom in the digital era. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09834-4
Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2015). A critical analysis of the role of wait time in classroom interactions and the effects on student and teacher interactional behaviours. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1009365
Jackson, D. O. (2022). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009063272
Jay, T., Willis, B., Thomas, P., Taylor, R., Moore, N., Burnett, C., Merchant, G., & Stevens, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/17014/1/Dialogic_Teaching_Evaluation_Report.pdf
Jocuns, K. F. (2021). Dialogic teaching as a way to promote students’ English language use in EFL classroom. PASAA, 62, 174–204. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_journal/file-4-49-k1c6pz218311.pdf
Karrar RKF, Abdelrady AH, Ibrahim DOO, Masuwd M, Nsaif RA, Alouzi K, Hmouma M, Zeat T, Aladi SHR and Alfallah B (2026). Automating language input: investigating the effect of AI-generated contextual flashcards delivered via Anki on EFL learners’ sentence-level fluency. Frontiers in Education. 11:1862047. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1862047
Klella, A. S. (2024). Accessibility and inclusivity in digital language education. University of Zawia Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 13(2). https://journals.zu.edu.ly/index.php/UZJEPS/article/view/1063
Klella, A. S. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education and its transformative role in educational technologies and learning systems. University of Zawia Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.26629/uzjeps.2026.05
Klella, A. S. A., & Al Garaghoolee, I. S. D. (2026). Cognitive and functional approaches to English language futurity in EFL contexts. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(Supplement 3), 401–416.
Klella, A. S. A., & Mrghem, Z. M. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A systematic review of thought provocation through AI ChatGPT prompts. ATRAS Journal, 5(3), 432–444. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/253661
Klella, A. S. A. (2025). From Thought to Speech: A Critical Review of Levelt’s Speech Production Model and Its Applications. Al-Qurtas Journal for Human and Applied Sciences, 4(26). https://alqurtas.alandalus-libya.org.ly/ojs/index.php/qjhar/article/view/1217
Laird-Gentle, A., Larkin, K., Kanasa, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2023). Systematic quantitative literature review of the dialogic pedagogy literature. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 46(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00029-9
Liang, W., & Fung, D. (2021). Fostering critical thinking in English-as-a-second-language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100769
Liu, Z., Sun, D., Zhang, L., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2025). The impact of classroom interaction on willingness to communicate: The mediating roles of speaking self-efficacy and foreign language enjoyment. PLOS ONE, 20(7), e0328226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328226
Lv, X., Ren, W., & Xie, Y. (2021). The effects of online feedback on ESL/EFL writing: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00594-6
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804394
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273
Mrghem, Z. M. O., & Klella, A. S. A. (2026). Cybersecurity Awareness in Higher Education: A Literature Review of Educational Practices and Digital Safety. North African Journal of Scientific Publishing (NAJSP), 4(2), 264-274. https://najsp.com/index.php/home/article/view/892
Nguyen, T. D. (2024). Students’ silence—Redefining what it means to participate in EFL classrooms. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24444
Prilutskaya, M. (2021). Examining pedagogical translanguaging: A systematic review of the literature. Languages, 6(4), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040180
Segal, A., Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching to the high stakes standardized test? Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225803
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217
Shea, D. P. (2019). Trying to teach dialogically: The good, the bad, and the misguided. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818768982
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2020). Teacher–student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1707512
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed., A. Kozulin, Ed.). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262304917/thought-and-language/
Vrikki, M., Kershner, R., Calcagni, E., Hennessy, S., Lee, L., Hernández, F., Estrada, N., & Ahmed, F. (2019). The teacher scheme for educational dialogue analysis (T-SEDA): Developing a research-based observation tool for supporting teacher inquiry into pupils’ participation in classroom dialogue. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1467890
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
Wotring, A., Chen, H., & Fraser, M. (2024). They are talking, but is it productive? Exploring EFL students’ small group talk. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3227
Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003
Ali, J. A., Alhoush, A. A., & Agile, N. S. (2026). Scaffolding through Interaction: A Discourse Analysis of Directive Speech Acts in a Guided Discovery EFL Classroom by Jim Scrivener. مجلة العلوم الشاملة, 11(41), 1-16.
ALNNALE, T. (2026). Teaching Methods and Methods and Their Impact on the Performance of Faculty Members Field Study. Shihab Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 53-79.
Essid, W. J. E. (2025). Libyan EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Teachers’ and Students’ Roles, Relationships, and Classroom Talk within Learner-Centred and Teacher-Centred Paradigms. مجلة العلوم الشاملة, 10(ملحق 38), 2850-2869.
Salama, G., Mohamed, I. H., & Arab, N. T. (2026). Assessment of the Prevalence of Hepatitis B Viruses among Chronic Renal Failure Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. مجلة العلوم الشاملة, 10(39), 3987-3995.
