Influential Linguistic Theories in English Language Teaching

Authors

  • Hanan Ali Sassi Shaban Department of English, Abu-Isa Faculty of Education, University of Zawia, Libya Author
  • Huwaydah Aboulqasim Amhimmid Aldeeb Department of English, Abu-Isa Faculty of Education, University of Zawia, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/.11.ملحق%2041.2219

Keywords:

English Language Teaching, linguistic theories, behaviourism, generative grammar, Vygotsky, communicative competence, eclectic approach.

Abstract

The field of English Language Teaching (ELT) has never existed in a theoretical vacuum. Its methodological evolutions from the mechanical drills of the Audio-Lingual Method to the meaning-centred practices of Communicative Language Teaching, have been shaped, often decisively, by developments in linguistics, psychology, and educational philosophy. This paper examines four major linguistic and cognitive theories that have fundamentally influenced how English is taught: Skinner's behaviourism, Chomsky's generative grammar and innatist theory, Piaget's cognitive constructivism, and Vygotsky's sociocultural theory. Adopting a descriptive analytical approach grounded in critical literature review, the paper traces the theoretical origins of each framework, analyses its pedagogical manifestations in classroom practice, and assesses its strengths and limitations in the context of second language teaching. A comparative analysis reveals a clear paradigm shift in ELT: from a preoccupation with linguistic form and accuracy towards a broader conception of communicative competence and meaning-making. The paper concludes by arguing that no single theory offers a sufficient account of the complexity of language learning, and that a principled eclectic approach one that draws thoughtfully from multiple theoretical traditions, best serves the diverse needs of contemporary learners. Implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and future research directions are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.

Benarose, A., & Hmouma, M. (2026). Mitigating Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: The Impact of a Self-Hosted AI Voice Chatbot in the Libyan EFL Context. International Journal of Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 79- 89. https://ijprmr.com/index.php/ijprmr/article/view/16

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Hmouma, Mohamed (2025). Analyzing Trump’s 2025 inaugural address using Fairclough’s Critical discourse analysis model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(1), 4630-4636.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. Edward Arnold.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). Norton. (Original work published 1936)

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Springer.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213-223.

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Influential Linguistic Theories in English Language Teaching. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 11(ملحق 41), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.65405/.11.ملحق 41.2219