The Impact of Slaughtering Female Cattle Compared to Males on the Sustainability of Livestock Production in Libya A Survey Study

Authors

  • Abdulhakim Khalifa Al-Ar Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, University of Zawiya, Al-Ajilat, Libya Author
  • Abdulmajid Belaid Ashkal Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, University of Zawiya, Al-Ajilat, Libya Author
  • Badr Salem Al-Majdoub Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, University of Zawiya, Al-Ajilat, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/yg799p17

Keywords:

ذبح اناث الماشية ؛اغنام ؛ماعز ؛ابقار؛ ابل ؛سلخانة العجيلات المركزية ، رعاية الحيوان، الإدراك والواعي

Abstract

This study was conducted at the Al-Ajilat Central Slaughterhouse. It was a cross-sectional study that included a questionnaire to identify the causes of meat wastage in female livestock and to determine the pregnancy rates of slaughtered female livestock in the study area. Additionally, the economic and meat/livestock losses resulting from animal wastage were estimated based on the current monetary values ​​of the average adult weight of female sheep and goats (approximately 30 kg), female cattle (approximately 250-300 kg), and female camels (approximately 150 kg). These values ​​were determined through a market survey (random sampling) conducted at the Al-Ajilat Central Slaughterhouse during October-November 2025. The survey addressed the causes of indiscriminate slaughter of female livestock, particularly pregnant animals, and provided a scientific perspective on animal welfare aspects related to the slaughter of female livestock. It also assessed the prevalence of slaughtering animals during a critical growth stage, when fetuses may be exposed to adverse effects. Given the limited data available on the prevalence of slaughter in Libya and the associated uncertainties, a systematic process of gathering knowledge from experts was deemed necessary. This process aimed to reduce the slaughter of female livestock, which leads to decreased future meat and milk production and the potential extinction of the local breed. Driven by high meat demand, ignorance of pregnancy status, and economic hardship, this practice can result in significant waste. Estimates suggest that the average percentage of animals slaughtered is (0.31, 50, 48.13, 40, 50, 60.13, 1, 34, 0, 70, 88, 1) for cattle, camels, sheep, and goats, respectively. This practice reduces the size of livestock herds nationally and harms Libya's agricultural economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1-Alhaji, N. B., Odetokun, I. A., Shittu, A., Onyango, J., Chafe, U. M., Abubakar, M. S., Muraina, I. A., Fasina, F. O., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Time-series analysis of ruminant foetal wastage at a slaughterhouse in North Central Nigeria between 2001 and 2012. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 82(1), 1–13.

2-Bello MB, Garba HS, Sonfada ML. 2008. Foetal wastage in camels slaughtered at Sokoto municipal abattoir. Sokoto J Vet Sci, 7(1), 46-9.

3-Bokko PB. 2011. Pregnancy wastage in sheep and goat in the Sahel region of Nigeria. Nig Vet J, 32(2), 120-126.

4-B. F. Muhammad, A. B. Mahmud, A. MustaphaEffect of processing method on composition and consumer acceptability of camel (Camelus dromedarious) meat and beef Niger. J. Anim. Prod., 38 (1) (2011), pp. 135-144.

5-Fayemi, P. O. , & Muchenje, V. (2013). Maternal slaughter at abattoirs: History, causes, cases and the meat industry. Springer Plus, 2, 125.

6-More, S., Bicout, D., Botner, A., Butterworth, A., Calistri, P., Depner, K., Edwards, S., Garin-Bastuji, B., Good, M., Schmidt, C. G., Michel, V., Miranda, M. A., Nielsen, S. S., Velarde, A., Thulke, H., Sihvonen, L., Spoolder, H., Stegeman, J. A., Raj, M., Willeberg, P., … Winckler, C. (2017). Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)

7-Müller, O. (2005). Malnutrition and health in developing countries. The Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(3), 279–286.

8-Maurer, P., Lücker, E., & Riehn, K. (2016). Slaughter of pregnant cattle in German abattoirs – Current situation and prevalence: A cross-sectional study. BMC Veterinary Research, 12(1), 91–99.

9-Ngbede, E. O. , Raji, M. A. , Kwanashie, C. A. , Okolocha, E. C. , Gugong, V. T. , & Hambolu, S. E. (2012). Serological prevalence of leptospirosis in cattle slaughtered in the Zango abattoir in Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. VeterinariaItaliana, 48(2), 179–184

10-Ndou, S.P., V. Muchenje, and M. Chimonyo.. 2011. Animal welfare in multipurpose cattle production systems and its implications on beef quality. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(7):1049–1064.

11-Njoga UJ, Njoga EO, Nwobi OC et al. Slaughter Conditions and Slaughtering of Pregnant Cows in Southeast Nigeria: Implications to Meat Quality, Food Safety and Security. Foods 2021; 10(6): 1298.

12-Qekwana, D.N., C.M.E. McCrindle, B. Cenci-Goga, and D. Grace.. 2019. Animal welfare in Africa: strength of cultural traditions, challenges and perspectives. In: Hild, S., and L. Schweitzer, editors. Animal welfare: from science to law. Paris: La Fondation Droit Animal, Éthique et Sciences (LFDA); p. 103–107.

13-Riding, G. A. , Lehnert, S. A. , French, A. J. , & Hill, J. R. (2008). Conceptus‐related measurements during the first trimester of bovine pregnancy. The Veterinary Journal, 175, 266–272.

14-Randolph, T., Schelling, E., Grace, D., Nicholson, C., Leroy, J., Cole, D., Demment, M., Omore, A., Zinsstag, J., & Ruel, M. (2007). Invited Review: Role of Livestock in Human Nutrition and Health for Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries. Journal of Animal Science, 85.

15-Zulu, V. , Mwanza, A. M. , Banda, F. C. , Yasuda, J. , & Yoshida, M. (2013). Cattle reproductive wastage in Zambia: A case of Mongu abattoir. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, 63, 49–54.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

The Impact of Slaughtering Female Cattle Compared to Males on the Sustainability of Livestock Production in Libya A Survey Study. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 10(39), 2902-2911. https://doi.org/10.65405/yg799p17