Factors Influencing Universities’ Adoption of Forensic Accounting Education: A Management Perspective

Authors

  • Waled Younes E Alazzabi Higher Institute of Science and Technology, Al-Rahibat Author
  • Osama Omar Gouma Higher Institute of Science and Technology, Al-Rahibat Author
  • Mousa Isa M Aboukrara Higher Institute of Science and Technology, Al-Rahibat Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/8v1srm90

Keywords:

Forensic accounting education, university management, behavioral intention, TPB, HBM, contingency theory, and fraud prevention.

Abstract

This conceptual paper identifies the management-related factors influencing universities’ adoption of forensic accounting education (FAE). With the rise of financial fraud, corporate scandals, and digital financial crimes, higher education institutions are increasingly required to equip graduates with investigative and analytical competencies. Despite this growing demand, universities differ significantly in their adoption and implementation of FAE programs. Drawing on the Institutional Theory (IST), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Contingency Theory, and the Health Belief Model (HBM), this study develops a comprehensive framework explaining how internal, external, and normative factors shape university management decisions and behavioral intentions. The paper integrates academic literature and professional resources, and highlighting technological developments while identifying key research gaps, including curriculum inconsistency, technological skill deficits, and lack of practical training. The study contributes to theory and practice by providing insights for university management and policymakers seeking to enhance forensic accounting education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Alabdullah, T. T. Y., Alfadhl, M. M. A., Yahya, S., & Rabi, A. M. A. (2014). The role of forensic accounting in reducing financial corruption: A study in Iraq. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 26–36.

Alazzabi, W. Y. E., Mustafa, H., & Karage, A. I. (2023). Risk management, top management support, internal audit activities and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(2), 569-582.

Alrawashedh, N. H. (2023). Factors affecting organizational intention to adopt forensic accounting practices: A case of Jordan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 343.

Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G., & Pacini, C. (2006). Accountants' perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 520-535.

Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage Publications.

Ellili, N., Nobanee, H., Haddad, A., Alodat, A. Y., & AlShalloudi, M. (2024). Emerging trends in forensic accounting research: Bridging research gaps and prioritizing new frontiers. Journal of Economic Criminology, 4, 100065.

Ernst & Young. (2006). Fraud investigation and dispute services: Global survey report.

Hidayat, R., & Al-Hadrami, I. (2015). Forensic accounting education: Global perspectives and developing countries. Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3), 283–303.

Islam, M. A., Ali, M. J., & Faruquee, R. (2011). Forensic accounting: Curriculum development and global practices. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 2(2), 45–63.

Issa, M., & Al-Azzabi, W. (2018). Assessing awareness and acceptance of forensic accounting among the Libyan accounting educators. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 6(4), 33-328.

Kasum, A. (2009). The role of forensic accountants in fraud detection. International Journal of Economics and Management, 3(2), 121–134.

Lee, T. A., Ng, M., & O’Leary, C. (2015). The benefits of forensic accounting education: Bridging theory and practice. Accounting Education, 24(5), 442–459.

Özkul, A., & Pamukçu, M. (2012). Forensic accounting: An overview. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 257–264.

Ruby, D., Arafa, S., Hassan, R., & Khan, M. (2024). Emerging Challenges in Forensic Accounting: Implications for Auditing Standards.

Seda, M., & Kramer, B. K. P. (2008). The emergence of forensic accounting programs in higher education. Management Accounting Quarterly, 9(3), 15.

Shields, M. (2009). Historical evolution of forensic accounting. Accounting History Review, 19(2), 145–167.

Smith, G., & Crumbley, D. (2009). Forensic accounting curriculum development. Advances in Accounting Education, 11, 149–167.

Wang, W., Zhao, Y., & Prabowo, Y. (2016). Determinants of universities’ adoption of forensic accounting education: A literature review. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(2), 80–96.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Factors Influencing Universities’ Adoption of Forensic Accounting Education: A Management Perspective. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 10(39), 2203-2212. https://doi.org/10.65405/8v1srm90