From Grammatical Knowledge to Communicative Use: An Applied Study of Linguistic Competence among Libyan EFL University Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/9sx9w517Keywords:
Grammatical knowledge, Communicative competence, Linguistic competence, EFL learners, LibyaAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between grammatical knowledge and communicative competence among Libyan university learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Although learners often acquire formal grammar rules in classroom settings, they struggle to apply this knowledge in real communicative contexts a discrepancy that reflects a gap between linguistic competence and communicative ability. Drawing on theoretical foundations that distinguish between knowing about language structure and using language appropriately in interactions, this research explores the degree to which grammatical competence predicts communicative performance in EFL settings. A mixed‑methods design was employed, combining grammar tests with communicative tasks and learner interviews. Findings reveal a moderate correlation between grammatical accuracy and communicative use, highlighting roles of sociolinguistic awareness and pragmatic strategy use. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for English language teaching in Libya, advocating integrative instructional approaches that balance structural accuracy with purposeful communication.
Downloads
References
• Adam, S., & Sailuddin, S. P. (2023). Correlation between grammatical competence and pragmatic competence among university EFL learners. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i3.30764
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Omar, Y. Z., & El-Werfalli, I. (2025). Learning English as a foreign language in Libyan language centres: Challenges and realities. Journal of the Faculty of Arts, University of Benghazi, 47, 113–132. https://doi.org/10.37376/jofoa.vi47.2103
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
• Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. Yale University Press.
• Tsulaia, E. (2023). Grammatical competence and communicative performance in EFL learners. South European Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.52340/sejl.2023.05.04
• World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Comprehensive Journal of Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.









