Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Media Work: An Analytical Study of Professional and Ethical Challenges and Governance Mechanisms

Authors

  • Ahmed Ali Ammar Abduljawad Libyan Academy for Postgraduate Studies, Janzour – Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/0vbccr45

Keywords:

generative AI; journalism; media ethics; governance; verification; newsrooms.

Abstract

This article examines how generative artificial intelligence reshapes media production and the tension between efficiency gains and editorial credibility. It adopts a documentary analytical approach and a selective thematic review of academic literature, institutional reports, and professional guidance; it does not claim original survey or interview data. The analysis addresses professional applications, risks of inaccuracy, bias, privacy breaches and intellectual property disputes, and organizational governance. It argues that the value and risks of generative tools depend on task sensitivity, while editorial accountability must remain human and demonstrable. A risk-tiered governance framework is proposed, including documented verification, proportionate disclosure, staff training, and escalation procedures. The framework is intended for contextual adaptation, including by Libyan media organizations, and has not been empirically validated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauder, D. (2023, August 16). AP, other news organizations develop standards for use of artificial intelligence in newsrooms. Associated Press.

Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.

Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Harvard University Press.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

Newman, N., & Cherubini, F. (2025). Journalism, media, and technology trends and predictions 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/journalism-media-and-technology-trends-and-predictions-2025

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms: Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information through a multistakeholder approach. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Media Work: An Analytical Study of Professional and Ethical Challenges and Governance Mechanisms. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 11(42), 1320-1328. https://doi.org/10.65405/0vbccr45