تأثير المعاملات التصنيعية على الخواص الطبيعية و التركيب الكيميائي لفول المانج
Keywords:
Manufacturing Processes, Chemical Composition, Mung Bean.Abstract
This study was conducted on mung bean samples to evaluate their physical properties and proximate chemical composition. The study aimed to investigate the impact of various processing treatmentsspecifically soaking, roasting, conventional cooking, and pressure cookingon the chemical composition of mung beans.Physical analysis revealed that the average 100-seed weight was 3.89 g, the average 100-seed volume was 3.53 cm³, and the mean seed density was 1.10 g/cm³. The water absorption and swelling rates increased by approximately 100% during a soaking period of 12 to 18 hours.The proximate composition of raw (unprocessed) mung bean seeds was as follows: 7.75% moisture, 26.28% protein, 1.55% fat, 4.10% ash, 3.13% fiber, and 64.94% carbohydrates. In the samples treated, the protein content ranged from 25.11% to 28.08%, fat from 1.38% to 1.53%, ash from 3.35% to 3.88%, and fiber from 2.33% to 3.21%. The carbohydrate content was 67.40%.Except for roasting, all processing treatments led to a significant reduction in the levels of sodium, calcium, potassium, and zinc. The loss in calcium reached 39%, while the loss for iron and copper was approximately 25%. Processing also affected the amino acid profile: the contents of valine, lysine, leucine, isoleucine, cysteine, and tryptophan decreased. However, tyrosine, threonine, and histidine levels decreased with soaking but increased with the other treatments. Phenylalanine content reduced after soaking but was unaffected by other methods, while methionine remained unchanged by all treatments.The protein solubility index was higher in a saline solution compared to water. Roasting, conventional cooking, and pressure-cooking reduced protein solubility, a change attributed to heat-induced protein denaturation.Lastly, all processing treatments except roasting decreased the total soluble sugar content, likely due to leaching into the water. A slight reduction in starch content was also observed across the treatments.
Downloads
References
- يوسف، م ،م . عطية، ر، ش. زينة، ح. م .(2001). تكنولوجيا البقوليات. مكتبة المعارف الحديثة, الإسكندرية : 53-60.
- Aman, P. (1979). Carbohydrate in raw and germinated seed form mung bean chick pea .J. Sci. Food and Agric. 30: 869-875.
- A O A C. (1997). Offical method of analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th Ed., Verginia, U.S.A.
- Dhillon, S. Naniawatee, H, S. (1989). Variation in seed storage protein of mung bean (Vigna radiate) variation.International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 7 (1): 103-110.
- Duranti M, Cerletti, P. (1979). Amino acid composition of seed protein of Lupines albus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27: 977-978.
- Dubois, M. Gilles K, A. Hamilton, J, K. Rebers, P. Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and relatad substances .Anal. Chem. 28: 350.
- El-Adawy T, A. (2002). Nutritional composition and ant nutrition factors of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)undergoing different cooking methods and germination. Plant Food for Human Nutrition 57: 83-97.
- El-Beltagy A, S, M. (1996). Effect of home traditional methods on the quality aspects some legumes. M. Sc. Thesis Fac. Agric. Minoufiya Univ. Egypt.
- El-Gammal O, S, I. (2000). Utilization mung bean proteins in home ice cream malting. Mansoura. 1st Mansoura Conf. Food Sci. and Dairy tech. 289-297.
- El-Reffael, W, H, M. (1998). Chemical and technological studies on mung bean .M. Sc. Thesis Fac. Agric. Ain Shams Univ. Egypt.
- Hussien H, I, M. (1989). Comparative studies of the chemical and biological value of some legume seeds. Ph. D. Thesis Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ. Egypt.
- Khalil, M, M. (1996). Chemical and biological evaluation on mung bean compared with faba bean effected by soaking, germination, autoclaving and cooking. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Egypt 12: 4451-4461.
- Miller E, L. (1967). Determination of tryptophan content of feeding stuff with particular reference to cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 18: 381-386.
- Mohamed, E, H. (2000). Mung bean as nontraditional food the Egyptian menu. M. Sc. Fac. Agric. Minufiya Univ. Egypt.
.
- Norton, G. Bliss, F, A. Bressani, R. (1985). Biochemical and nutritional attributes of grains legumes. pp 73-114. In R. J. Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. Grain legume Crops. Collins London.
- Poehlman, S, M.(1991). In"The mung bean". P 312. West view Press, Boulder ,Sanfrancisco , Oxford.
- Rao, P. Belavady, B. (1978). Oligosaccharides in pulses varietel differences and effects of cooking and germination. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26 (2): 316-319.
- Sekhon, K, S. Gupta, S, K. Bakhshi, A, K.(1979). Amino acid composition of mung bean (Phaseolus aureus). Indian Journal of nutrition and Diet. 16(11): 417 -419.
- Singh, U. Voraputhaporn, P. Rao V. Jambunathan, R. (1989). Physicoch-mical characteristics of pigeon pea and mung bean starches and their noodle quality. J. Food Sci. 54: 1293-1297.
- Sobihah, T, Y.(2004). Chemical characterization, Functional properties and nutritional quality of mung bean proteins. Ph. D. Thesis Fac. Agric. Minufiya Univ. Egypt.
- Williams, P, C. Nakonl, H, H. Singh, K, B. (1983). Relation ship between cooking and some physical characteristics in chick pea. J. Sci. Food Agric. 34: 492-496.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








