The Multiplicity of Meaning: A Comparative Analysis of Polysemy in Quranic Translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/r43r7525Keywords:
Quranic Translation, Polysemy, Linguistics, Comparative Analysis, Semantic LossAbstract
The translation of religious texts poses unique and intricate challenges. This is particularly more apparent when it pertains to capturing the subtle meaning by using suitable equivalence, since one lexical term has various meanings based on its particular context. This study examines the difficulties and consequences of translating these polysemous words from Arabic to English. The data of this study were collected from the Quran, where four verses that contain the terms Fitnah, Ummah, and Huda were chosen because they have different meanings. Employing a qualitative and comparative approach, the research examines the terms Fitnah, Ummah, and Huda within three prominent translations: Marmaduke Pickthall (1930), Abdullah Yusuf Ali (1934), and M.A.S. Abdel Haleem (2004). The results indicate that dependence on "formal equivalence" or literal translation frequently results in "semantic thinning," causing the theological richness and logical consistency of the original text to be diminished. In contrast, contemporary "functional" methods that emphasize contextual interpretation are better at maintaining and conveying the original message. The research finds that although no English term can entirely capture the complex essence of Quranic polysemy, employing explanatory descriptors and exegetical footnotes is crucial to avoid theological misinterpretation and provide a clearer understanding for non-Arabic speakers.
Downloads
References
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (2004). The Qur'an: A new translation. Oxford University Press.
Abdul-Raof, H. (2001). Qur'an translation: Discourse, texture and exegesis. Curzon Press.
Academy of the Arabic Language. (2011). Al-Mu’jam al-Waseet. Maktabat al-Shuruq al-Duwaliyyah.
Al-Isfahani, A. R. (1992). Mu’jam Mufradat Alfadh al-Quran. Dar al-Qalam
Al-Suyuti, J. (2011). Al-itqan fi ulum al-Quran [The perfect guide to the sciences of the Quran]. (Various Eds.).
Al-Zarkashi, M. (1957). Al-burhan fi ulum al-Quran [The proof in the sciences of the Quran]. Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-Arabiyah.
Ali, A. (2015). Conceptual metaphor and polysemy in Quranic discourse. Journal of Quranic Studies, 17(1), 1–28.
Ali, A. Y. (1934). The holy Qur'an: Text, translation and commentary. Sheikh Muhammad Ashraf.
Dussouchet, H. (2010). The semantic features of the Quranic word ‘Taqwa’: A semiotic and linguistic study. In The Qur'an: Text, interpretation and translation. [Publisher missing in original - insert publisher if known].
El-Hassan, S. A. (2014). The Arabic particle 'Lamma' in the Qur'an: A cognitive semantic study. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(1).
Izutsu, T. (2002). God and man in the Koran: Semantics of the Koranic Weltanschauung. Islamic Book Trust. (Original work published 1964).
Ibn Manzur, M. (1955). Lisan al-Arab. Dar Sadir.
Karrar RKF, Abdelrady AH, Ibrahim DOO, Masuwd M, Nsaif RA, Alouzi K, Hmouma M, Zeat T, Aladi SHR and Alfallah B (2026). Automating language input: investigating the effect of AI-generated contextual flashcards delivered via Anki on EFL learners’ sentence-level fluency. Front. Educ. 11:1862047. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1862047
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating. E.J. Brill.
Musa, A.(2021) Polysemy in the Translation of the Holy Qur’an: The Terms ‘Ayah’ and ‘Ummah’ as a Case Study,” June 2025, doi: 10.34874/prsm.ejc-vol2iss1.4015.
Pickthall, M. M. (1930). The meaning of the glorious Koran: An explanatory translation. Alfred A. Knopf.
Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.
Salama, A. H. (2011). A pragmalinguistic analysis of the polysemous word ‘Amr’ in the holy Qur’an. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11).
Suleiman, Y. (2013). Arabic in the fray: Language ideology and cultural politics. Edinburgh University Press.
