Scaffolding through Interaction: A Discourse Analysis of Directive Speech Acts in a Guided Discovery EFL Classroom by Jim Scrivener

Authors

  • Joud A. Ali Department of Applied Linguistics, School of Language, Libyan Academy, Janzour, Libya Author
  • Akraam A. Alhoush Department of Applied Linguistics, School of Language, Libyan Academy, Janzour, Libya Author
  • Najma S. Agile Department of Applied Linguistics, School of Language, Libyan Academy, Janzour, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/s8sq1s79

Keywords:

EFL, Directive speech acts, Guided Discovery, IRF, Scaffolding.

Abstract

This discourse analysis investigates the types of directive speech acts employed by a teacher and their pedagogical functions add as scaffolding tools within a guided discovery EFL classroom. A qualitative descriptive method was used to analyse YouTube video of Jim Scrivener teaching eight adult EFL learners. Data were collected throughout the observation and transcript analysis. The findings revealed the three main types of directive speech acts: questions, requests, and commands. questions emerged as the most frequent type, serving to elicit responses, monitor comprehension, facilitate corrective feedback, and guided learners toward the independent discovery of lexical and grammatical forms. Requests encouraged students to make sentences, while commands helped direct attention and increase participation. The study also found that these directive speech acts functioned as scaffolding tools by promoting learner discovery,

 

self-correction, peer feedback, and collaborative learning . The study underscores the significant role of directive speech acts in facilitating interaction and supporting language development and learner-centred EFL contexts .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alawiyah, T. (2024). Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF) in classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.06

2. Alghamdy, R. Z. (2024). English teachers’ practice of classroom discourse in light of Zone of Proximal Development theory and scaffolding techniques. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.06

3. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

4. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

5. Awadelkarim, A. A. (2021). An analysis and insight into the effectiveness of scaffolding: EFL instructors’/teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 828–841. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.58

6. Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73–81.

7. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.6848

8. Darong, H. C. (2024). Teaching speech acts in EFL context. Frontiers in Education,9

9. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984

10. Prasetyo, R. I., & Mulyani, M. (2018). Teacher’s directives speech acts in teaching-learning interactions: Classroom discourse analysis. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v7i3.26607

11. Reiland, I. (2024). Austin vs. Searle on locutionary and illocutionary acts. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2380322

12. Rijal, R., Fatmawati, A., & Wulandari, S. (2025). Unpacking the IRF pattern: A discourse analysis of classroom interaction: Examining the IRF pattern at SMKN 3 Kediri. ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 13(2), 415.

13. https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/eltin/article/view/6310

14. Sachs, G. (2018). Guided discovery learning in language education. Language Teaching Research, 22(4), 410–426.

15. Scrivener, J. (n.d.). The demand is high for teachers and learners. TeachingEnglish (British Council). Retrieved June 5, 2026, from

16. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/news-and-events/seminars/jim-scrivener-demand-high-te achers-and-learners

17. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

18. Sulistyani. (2018). The power of directive speech acts in EFL classroom interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017) (pp. 16–20). https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.4

19. Suryandani, P. D., & Budasi, I. G. (2021). An analysis of directive speech acts produced by teachers in EFL classroom. Journal of English Language and Culture, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v12i1.2823

20. Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Routledge.

21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=RxjjUefze_oC

22. Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Scaffolding through Interaction: A Discourse Analysis of Directive Speech Acts in a Guided Discovery EFL Classroom by Jim Scrivener. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 11(41), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.65405/s8sq1s79